Anthropologist Harvey Whitehouse writes about what he terms imagistic vs. doctrinal religions. I’ve come across the terms lately when reading about the practices of Hellenic mystery cults. The doctrinal mode of religion is characterized by a top-down hierarchy, involving regularly repeated daily or weekly rituals, written texts, standard teachings, and lower levels of emotional arousal. Imagistic religion is less structured, with little or no hierarchy or doctrine, characterized by periodic festivals with high levels of emotion that mark a break from regular daily life. Imagistic religions utilize ecstatic trance states and altered forms of consciousness to bring about direct divine contact; doctrinal religion employs mediators to interpret the divine.
I’m finding this division very useful in thinking about modern Paganism. My experience of it is highly imagistic and seems to have a surprising amount in common with the old mystery cults. Surprising because I don’t think anyone has done that on purpose; it just seems to have happened. Most of my practice takes place at home, on my own and without much external human guidance. Eight times a year I go do ritual with my druid grove, which while done in marvelous company has a lot in common with my home practice; we don’t go wild at druid grove. But there are certain points on my personal religious calender where I do pretty much what they did in the mystery cults. I go off to the woods with many like-minded people, camp out, experience a different mode of life, and spend my days in contemplation or purification (or sleep) and my nights in ecstatic trance. I did something like this at Ostara, minus the camping (but with extra sleep-deprivation!) where we walked or danced on fire and then went to a cavern 50 feet underground to drum and dance and chant the night away. I’ll do this at Four Quarters Farm at least once this summer and perhaps more. If I get the time and the resources and the company, I’ll try to go to Starwood or Sirius Rising or some other such summer festival. A summer without at least one of these leaves me feeling like I’ve missed something important. There are a lot of us who feel the same way, though it’s by no means a universal experience for Pagans. People go for their own reasons, I suppose, but almost everyone I know that goes to these goes for the same reason I do – for the Mystery. Like the old Mysteries, and like Whitehead’s description of imagistic religion, it can’t be explained if you haven’t been there.
I’m reading Hugh Dowden’s book on mystery cults right now, and I keep thinking, yes, of course they did that, that’s like what I do. Not in the content, so much as we know of it, as the concept: get out of town and into a different world and do something profound in a place apart.
Because I think it is hilarious, here’s me and one of my besties, Maebius, on a Starwood morning (which I think was at about two in the afternoon.) Maebius is the exceedingly happy one; I am the one making GTFO face.

April 16, 2010 at 5:13 pm
*grin* The mystery is why I had forgotten about that image, and what was I smiling about?
On a more serious note, I don’t think I’ve come across the terms imagistic vs doctrinal, but they make perfect sense. Yes to profundity in a place apart! (That needs to be a bumper sticker) Neat!
April 17, 2010 at 2:58 am
I think the modern pagan movement became imagistic vs doctrinal naturally. I’m not an expert on the birth of neo-paganism, but I’m pretty sure it was born as a sort of counter-cultural revolution, as a way to go against the dominant religion of the time and regain some of what was lost by reconnecting with older deities and older ways. When one considers that Christianity is extremely doctrinal, it makes sense that paganism would be structured in a way that deliberately goes against that.
April 17, 2010 at 7:42 am
Very interesting indeed, and I agree regarding the evolution as an intentional distancing from the dogmatic monotheism of the time. However, it’s too large an umbrella-question to get into here, but the spectrum seems to span across the vidide in terms of modern neo-pagan Paths. I’ve met soem pretty dogmatic Wiccans in this area and over the years, who would put to shame
Catholic High Mass in terms of pomp and ceremony.
… then again, if you look through certain Christian lenses, there’s a pertty deep Mystery Tradition there too, which seems to have gotten drowned out by the popular culture’s fundamentalist propaganda. (not meaning to derail the conversation with that topic!)
As with everything, there’s degrees and exceptions to any rule, but the Original idea of an imagistic Paganism holds true for a good majority of cases.
April 19, 2010 at 9:27 am
I can’t count the times I’ve attempted to return to Christianity determined that I’ll be able to remain there if I keep the imagistic lenses on.
Heck, somedays I even think that Christianity is imagistic at its core and that the doctrinal crap is just stuff that has been tacked on.
However that “crap” is really really tough to get rid of.
Plus it’s hard when you’re surrounded by those who are not only wearing different lenses than you, but who are also determined to rip away and crush any lenses that don’t match their own.
(Boy am I having fun with this metaphor!)
I think, deep in my heart of hearts, I try to return to Christianity for the community, but that’s just too hard to do, because I’m not Christian.
And with that, I’ll apologize for perhaps derailing this conversation. (Though, I hope, not too much.)
April 19, 2010 at 10:45 am
Kay, Maebius, I don’t think it’s a derail, much – with this post I’m more interested personally with the intersections between festival culture and the mystery cult experience – this is something I would like to poke and prod a bit more thoroughly, maybe in another context.
However, the whole imagistic/doctrinal thing is also an interesting package. I think any religion has doctrinal and imagistic elements – it seems more like a spectrum to me. Kay, I think your concept of treating these categories as lenses is interesting. Dowden talks about some of the imagistic elements of Christianity (though I haven’t hit that chapter yet).
April 19, 2010 at 11:07 am
In terms of the festival/cult experience, I will have to agree. While I’ve not studied the Mystery cults much beyond heresay and fantasy/SciFi books, there’s definitely a correlation there.
Having attended a few myself, and being asked by others to describe them, it’s something you have to experience personally. It’s not that the events there are secret, it is more they are to be Experienced, and hard to explain. Words saying “Oh, we drummed all night” are not even close to Being there. There’s a lot that happens below the surface words.
So I see Nettle’s original point as being quite accurate, to what I know of the Mystery traditions. I’d also be quite interested in seeing the topic expanded upon in future posts.
April 19, 2010 at 1:23 pm
I’ve never been to a group festival or ritual of any sort. (I’d really like to go.) However it’s safe to say that the only time I’ve ever experienced (outside of dreams) what I might describe as ‘liminal’ or divine has been when I’ve been out and about in the woods or some such place. (What I mean to say is that it hasn’t happened to me in a formal setting like a church.)
And Maebius deserves the credit for the “lens” language. She inspired me.
April 19, 2010 at 3:04 pm
LOL! Teaches me to assume gender, doesn’t it!?
April 19, 2010 at 3:11 pm
I was going to let that one slide. After all, I do own a broomstick skirt. (and a kilt too, but you know…)
Hopefully you’ll get to experience a festival. If you’ve ever gone to a Renaissance Faire, they are, well, not quite like that.
April 19, 2010 at 3:22 pm
Good grief Maebius! It could have gone on for months! Don’t do that!
I do occasionally attend the Shakespeare Festival here in Utah. The staff wears period costumes (even the food vendors). It’s all very, um, androgynous.
May 26, 2012 at 12:50 am
I think the modern pagan movement became imagistic vs doctrinal naturally. I’m not an expert on the birth of neo-paganism, but I’m pretty sure it was born as a sort of counter-cultural revolution, as a way to go against the dominant religion of the time and regain some of what was lost by reconnecting with older deities and older ways. When one considers that Christianity is extremely doctrinal, it makes sense that paganism would be structured in a way that deliberately goes against that.
February 3, 2013 at 7:26 am
“Imagistic religion, mystery cults, festivals Druids Apprentice” ended up being a pretty
wonderful post, . I hope you keep posting and I am going to continue
to keep reading through! Thanks -Steven